Does anyone have a definitive answer to whether the receivers are shut off in airplane mode?
I think there is a serious philosophical question here, namely what various people are willing to regard as a "definitive answer".
Clearly, for some people, the language on the GrapheneOS web site does not count as a "definitive answer". That's fine; everybody is free to decide what sort of answer to accept.
But for me a big question is: If the language on the GrapheneOS web site is not "definitive", what would count as "definitive"?
As I have written before (not just in this thread!), I think the next level down would be hiring an RF engineer, or going to a university lab with RF test equipment, or locating an amateur radio operator with microwave test equipment. Such a person, working from public technical details of the RF modem, will be able to reliably detect whether the modem is or is not running at any given moment. It would then be possible to enter airplane mode and monitor the phone for some amount of time.
But how much monitoring would be "definitive"? One hour? A day? A month? In theory the cellular modem could be designed to self-activate every 37 days!
Also, it would be necessary to repeat the experiment for each device model, and arguably to re-run the experiment for each model every time there is a new firmware release.
So... just what would count as a "definitive answer"? Again, different people can have different standards for that. And it would be great if some member of the GrapheneOS community either did a solid examination or hired somebody to do one (even if it were just one device and just one afternoon).
But if an "overwhelmingly definitive" answer is not possible, which I suspect it isn't, then probably most people will end up having to settle for a "pretty good" answer. Perhaps the answer already on the GrapheneOS web site is close enough? But if not, I encourage people to consider:
- Exactly what kind of answer would be better than the answer that is already there?
- What steps can the community take toward an answer like that, assuming the GrapheneOS developers are busy developing GrapheneOS (and also taking into account that people keep expressing skepticism about the statements already made by the GrapheneOS developers)?