• Development

  • What features will be missing in GOS' Android 15 version?

de0u

high-resolution IR face camera (clearly some Pixel devices have this)

Only the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL had IR face scanning. They had dual IR scanners for 3D scanning, a dot projector and a flood illuminator. Face unlock on the recent Pixel generations is a software feature entirely based on the front camera. The front camera is far more primitive than the rear cameras and didn't even support autofocus until the Pixel 8 Pro and all models of the 9th generation Pixels, but it's a more primitive kind of autofocus. They use phase detection autofocus rather than dual pixel autofocus which is more primitive and doesn't provide as much data for face scanning. We could add support for it if we really wanted but it's not really a good implementation of face unlock and we're not fans of it. 9th gen Pixels moved to nicer ultrasonic fingerprint scanners.

      GrapheneOS Oh, I didn't realize that the stock OS's face unlock on the Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 was using a regular visual camera. Thanks for clarifying that. I can imagine that might dampen the project's enthusiasm.

        Dumdum Ah, little bit disappointing but it serves as a nice feature to confine sandboxed Play along with the apps requiring it into a Private Space. We will see how the UI looks and if there is possibility to share files and images in a Storage Scopes setting spanning both the Owner and Private Space.

          fid02 Thanks for your response. I was curious about clipboard functionality as well. Can I copy and paste text from the private space to my main profile and vice versa?

              GrapheneOS We already added Private Space integration

              Will GOS' implementation allow nesting VPNs such that if I have a VPN active in my owner profile and a simultaneously active but different VPN in the private space, the 'entry or real user IP' the private space VPN sees or reports is that of the owner profile's VPN? In this case, if only the owner profile has an active VPN, the IP of the space as visible to its apps and reported while browsing any IP testing site would be that of the owner's profile VPN.

                  missing-root They also removed the headphone jack, which I guess is the biggest security issue

                  The USB-C port works just fine as a headphone jack, I am using it all the time. You just need USB-C earplugs or an adapter from USB-C to analog headphone jack. I cannot see how USB-C would be less secure than a regular analog headphone jack. But I totally understand not wanting to use Bluetooth.

                      ryrona

                      I talked about security. Headphone jacks work waaay better than a dongle, trust me, do an A/B comparison.

                      It works better, is faster and most importantly it just does audio I/O and like 3 commands for the buttons.

                      The GrapheneOS USB port settings can set it to "charging only" which is a big security advantage against unknown attacks.

                          17 days later

                          missing-root No, they didn't degrade security by moving back to fingerprint unlock for the Pixel 4a and later. Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL are the only Pixel devices with no fingerprint unlock. Every Nexus/Pixel since the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P has had fingerprint unlock other than those two phones. It was not well received due to being significantly more expensive with few benefits. They also added to the cost by including Soli radar alongside the dual IR cameras, dot projector and flood illuminator. They dropped all of this for the Pixel 4a and later, and have never included any of it again. That's how badly received it was with the 4th gen flagships. Every device since then has fingerprint unlock. Pixel 6 and later moved to under screen, other than the 7th gen Fold and Tablet which used the power button and the 9 Pro Fold which does the same.

                          Face unlock is only included as a secondary frill alongside fingerprint unlock for the Pixel 7 and later. It was quite bad on the Pixel 7 and couldn't even qualify as a strong biometric unlock option despite the low bar for that so not all apps would work after using it to unlock without further authentication. Pixel 8 and later fixed that, but it's still not up to our standards. We prefer fingerprint unlock over even the 4th gen flagship face unlock, but GrapheneOS did support face unlock for the flagship 4th generation Pixels. We have nothing against supporting it when it's properly secured.

                              missing-root The audio input and output for the analog audio jack was always very low quality due to never having a high end DAC. There's still wired headphone support via USB-C. Even the basic Apple and Google USB-C DAC provide far high quality audio.

                              USB-C headphones are fully compatible with our USB-C port control feature with the default Charging-only while locked node. It allows the existing connection to continue while locked but disables new USB connections immediately and then fully disables USB when the headphones are disconnected. It does reduce security compared to not using it through keeping USB data partially active after locking while it's in use, but only while in use and data is fully disabled immediately as soon as it's unplugged. New connections are also blocked immediately after locking including at a hardware level, not just a software level. The USB-C controller in Pixels supports blocking the new connections at a hardware level while keeping existing connections working and has disabling data completely as a separate thing we can do once the existing connections end. It also has the option to fully disable it for even charging, which is quite useful since USB-PD isn't simple.

                              Analog audio jacks going away is simply something you're going to have to accept as part of devices becoming more modern in the same way that laptops rarely have an Ethernet port anymore despite that being more secure than exposing Wi-Fi attack surface. Phones also don't have Ethernet ports but you can still use Ethernet if you really want to via USB-C in the same way you can still use wired headphones. Dedicated charging ports on laptops are also going away and being replaced by USB-C charging. USB-C technically supports up to 240W power being supplied... Dedicated display outputs are also being replaced with USB-C via DisplayPort alternate mode. This is simply how things are going. Eventually there will probably be no ports on devices... By then, hopefully all the firmware and driver code is in a memory safe language combined with far better exploit mitigations and fuzzing, etc.

                                  ignition VPNs are per-profile and it's no different with Private Space. Private Space is essentially a replacement for managing a work profile with a local device management app. It can be used alongside it and has better integration for local usage.

                                    NightSky
                                    Bars are nonsense, look up the real signal strength is settings > about phone > SIM status slot n

                                    Disregard if you were looking for bars for WiFi only. I’m not too clear on which signal strength you want bars for, WiFi or cellular.

                                      GrapheneOS Every device since then has fingerprint unlock

                                      On an unrelated and more nostalgic note, I was (am) a big fan of the Pixel 2 fingerprint implementation. It also added the nice feature of the swiping-down gesture. Also, at the end of its lifetime I was able to pull it out of my pocket already unlocked. Felt pretty dope.

                                      If the GrapheneOS phone is ever going to be made pretty please consider this ;)

                                          Sirut OTA as normal. You will receive a normal System Update Notification and can get your beautiful hands on a shiny GOS with Android 15.

                                            GrapheneOS

                                            I do not doubt that the OS has all the needed audio capabilities.

                                            But:

                                            • I never heard distortion with the builtin DAC of a 4a
                                            • plug-and-play just works soo much better, on Laptops and phones, than with a usb-c data dongle
                                            • I need to keep data enabled, which I would otherwise block entirely
                                            • For security reasons that means I need to unlock my phone, then plug the dongle in
                                            • the Google Pixel DAC is unavailable in any german electronics store and afaik also in the online store. Which is hillarious
                                            • the apple DAC works fine, but reduces the max volume on non-Apple devices, "for safety". This is a problem with bigger headphones
                                            • I use the usb-c port way more, especially when travelling, meaning way more wear and potential need to replace, which is costy when not doing it yourself, and takes long shipping times when doing yourself

                                            There simply is no reason, if you dont need very HQ audio (again which I never heard a difference even with very nice headphones) to remove a simple, unhackable analog AUX port and replace it with an overcomplicated USB-C port.

                                            You can't change the Pixel hardware and that is okay. I donate to your project and comment under videos like Techlores how absurd their "GrapheneOS ignorance" is.

                                            But Google went a few stupid directions with their phones (aux removal, glass back, too large, worse fprint sensor), which is not anything you need to defend.

                                                Phead

                                                I agree a lot, the 5a was the last one with that. It didnt require pressing the power button (or keeping touch always enabled), worked way faster had less false negatives, thus allowed to register more fingers in practice.

                                                @GrapheneOS do you know if the newer sensors since the 6 had any security benefit, i.e. less false positives? I think to have heard that the new sensors in the 9 (?) have security benefits

                                                  Has there been an announcement on when GOS with Android 15 will release?
                                                  Private space could potentially remove my need for profiles :)

                                                  Thanks

                                                    epileptic055 Has there been an announcement on when GOS with Android 15 will release?

                                                    GrapheneOS based on Android 15 will be released shortly after Android 15 has been officially released to Google Pixel phones. The porting work is already done, but the GrapheneOS team has said they won't make a release based on a beta.

                                                    The last rumors I heard was that Google will release it for Pixels on 15th October. But I do not know if this has been confirmed officially.