locked It was Singapore.
Hathaway_Noa
- Joined Jun 9, 2022
locked I had this happen to me years ago in a certain Asian country, they asked me to unlock my phone and computer (which I did back then since I was afraid, that country has no good human rights respecting image).
I need advice and tips about traveling with a phone.
What would the best option be:
Backing up everything manually in a cloud (logins etc), then wiping your phone and pass border control and after settling in order country again installing everything again manually? I want to hear thoughts from other people regarding this subject. Thanks!
100% Samsung galaxy, which one exactly hard to tell.
Wondering the same, his easy to follow tutorials are always my number 1 resource if somebody asks me 'how to install grapheneOS', I hope he's doing fine.
Amazing update, very hyped about this!
popsicleman Of course
- Edited
I uploaded all the necessary PDF files detailing their capabilities / release notes + how to use on the following link:
https://easyupload.io/m/t94ht1
With every new Cellebrite Premium / Inseyets updateI will upload the PDF files :)
paul_le_roux you can also put an esim on a physical sim ;)
You can also use eSIM, it doesnt need kyc.
- Edited
[deleted] maybe it's a good idea for GOS to implement some sort of multi-signing for each push update they perform. It would reduce a single point of error.
New court case in the Netherlands regarding pixel phone, EVERY pixel phone that they cannot decrypt/unlock is 'uncontrolled' and the public prosecutors always try their hardest to keep those pixel phones from being returned to their owners. Sometimes the judges go along and sometimes they wont.
The public prosecutor has taken the position that the seized cannabis buds should be withdrawn from traffic.
The Google Pixel phone should also be hidden from traffic. Although the police have not yet been able to investigate this telephone, it is known that this type of telephone is often used to communicate encrypted to commit criminal offences. According to the public prosecutor, the uncontrolled possession of a Google Pixel phone is therefore contrary to the public interest and the law.
The public prosecutor has asked the court to confiscate the seized iPhone, now that conversations or chats were conducted with this phone that related to the planning of the criminal offense.
The seized beacon can be returned to the seized party.
Source: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2024:2669
UndercoverBozo exactly, let him enlighten us...
kirillan10 are you trolling?
OnionNetworkSide there are people working their ass off to get that kind of information and you think they just share to someone unknown such specific information?
I would encourage GrapheneOS to keep thr details and specifics to themselves, let those forensic companies die in their rage ;)
This is so tiresome :(
- Edited
Suspect, [co-suspect] and [name 12] (hereinafter: [name 12]) use several telephones at the same time, including Google Pixels. Six Google Pixels were identified in the study. The Google Pixels run on the GrapheneOS operating system, which improves user privacy and security. In addition, the Molly application is installed on these telephones. Molly is a modified version of Signal, which is more secure.
The public prosecutor has taken the position that the suspect's mobile phone of the Google Pixel brand, type 4a, should be confiscated. The public prosecutor has put forward that the phone is a PGP device that is generally not returned to suspects and that the contents have not yet been examined because the device could not be decrypted.
The suspect has taken the position that the Google Pixel is not a PGP phone and that there are no incriminating matters on it. It is not clear to the suspect why this telephone still needs to be investigated, while the investigation has been completed
The court is of the opinion that the interests of criminal proceedings preclude the return of the Google Pixel mobile phone listed on the seizure list. This criminal law interest does not end with the conclusion of the investigation in the first instance. Now that the criminal law interest still opposes return, the telephone will be forfeited.
Source: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2024:2048
Another:
The police saw on camera images that on the evening in question one of the suspects from the group placed or hid something in the parking lot near a fence. Later, officers found a Google Pixel phone and a Nokia phone near the fence. The Nokia was still on, because the screen lit up when the police found this phone. The court therefore assumes that the telephones belonged to one or more suspects.
The Google Pixel phone had the GrapheneOS operating system installed. This is an alternative operating system that is designed to guarantee privacy/anonymity as best as possible and to communicate anonymously. According to reporting officers, such telephones are frequently used in criminal circles.
Source: https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBZWB:2023:6754
Basically whenever you come across court cases in the Netherlands where criminals used Pixel phones, it's 90% chance they had GrapheneOS installed on them since it's the most popular OS in Dutch criminal world. In a lot of court cases they straightly mention the google pixel phones as cryptophones and are able to confiscate them in a case against a s suspect solely because the suspect used a google pixel phone. Since this has become an issue some criminals are now using google pixel phones but modified the appearance of the phone to look like an Iphone since its less suspected during car checks and what not.
Im reading the reports, it looks like he used GrapheneOS (but its never mentioned in the report and I think that's deliberately). Just recently Dutch courts started mentioning GrapheneOS and having GrapheneOS on your phone is enough reason to get your phone confiscated in a case since it will be stamped is 'crypto phone'. I'm still going through the reports of this Swedish case (I use a translator tool).
This is a legit concern and is most likely already in the happening, there is a grapheneOS fork going around here in w Europe (forgot to the name) which is most likely a fed operation or at least I suspect it since some dealers involved in the arcaneOS / Anon phone are again reselling these phones.