secrec
"hardware vulnerabilities are harder to address than software."
Yes, but the Pixel security chip is better suited for securing encryption keys/signature checks than anything we have software wise right now. Its harder to address if some horrific exploit were to be revealed, but it is also harder to exploit in the first place. Even if one is found, all pixel series have a set time of software updates, while the security chips have very few security weaknesses.
"Is it secure to make it impossible to recover data that you own?"
Its not, since secure authentication would mean you are able to authenticate when correct conditions are given, however, it is possible to recover your data. You can simply unlock the phone and copy the files, the data isn't hard locked, its just only readable by the proper OS and is encrypted using the token from the security chip.
"There is also the flip side of security, which is the ability to control your own data"
This is more about usability, no? Wouldn't this imply its more secure in some way to not use encryption at all so if need be you could take out the flash and copy the data from there?
IDK much about what's public about the Titan M chip, but I don't think its a 'blackbox'...GOS seems to know how to use its API and its internal workings fairly well