Eirikr70 Hi, I sent you a message on Wikipedia and I suggest you take a look at my edits. I remembered your comments about the summary being too technical and I think I've managed to write a short summary based on the relevant information on the website and then I added some other informations that I think are relevant.
I deleted some redundant explanations in the first part (such as ease of use for users regardless of their level of technical expertise). This is explained later, and there is no need to specify “level of technical expertise” after “users.” “all users” is sufficient. I changed ‘vulnerabilities’ to “exploits,” which is the correct term to use here. I don't think it's relevant to mention that GrapheneOS released its version of Android 16 in June 2025 in the history section, and it would need to be updated with each new version of AOSP.
I removed the section on the Duress Pin and reinserted it in a neutral tone (no controversy, please) in the overview of security and privacy features.
And I suggest seriously modifying or even completely deleting the part about the “controversy in France,” or at least explaining that this smear campaign confused GrapheneOS with forks that use strange features that do not exist in GOS.