New manufacturer — theories and predictions

shadowbeany

I agree with many of the folks here. I think it'll be OnePlus or Nothing. I wish it was Fairphone, but don't think so.

Xtreix

Alternative GrapheneOS is open to collaborating with most OEMs, and I would be enthousiast to Sony, but I wouldn't expect it to happen initially. GrapheneOS has announced that the device will be a model without a 3.5 mm audio jack, and Sony is a very conservative company that does not currently sell its mobile devices in the US and Canadian markets, which are large markets. At present, it seems more logical for Sony to extend its proprietary Android-based operating system from its Xperia phones to its Afeela 1 electric cars built by Honda.

shadowbeany I wish it was Fairphone, but don't think so.

GrapheneOS will never collaborate with a manufacturer that spreads misinformation about GrapheneOS, about security/privacy in general, and that partners with a for-profit company for the operating system that attacks GrapheneOS and the community.

shadowbeany

Xtreix Yeah, I guess you're right about everything. We can just sit and wait to see which one will be.

Xtreix

shadowbeany Several commentators seem almost certain that it is Motorola. For me, this is still speculation, but Motorola seems like a credible possibility. Their models are sold all over the world, their devices do not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, and the new models will use the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 with MTE support.

shadowbeany

Xtreix I'd love it to be Motorola to be honest. I'd stick with Pixel, honestly, but I think they are a great choice.

Ilgar

I'd love to see ips display without pwm flickering and dithering (mini-led) at least for grapheneos tablet.

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

How will selling a phone with GrapheneOS be worthwhile for a major OEM? They can't put their spyware/adware/ licensed proprietary third-party apps on the phone, so they'd lose some revenue because of it. And the user base for this OS is pretty small.

https://nitter.net/OvertonBrawling/status/1986535697348460743#m

23Sha-ger

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e How will selling a phone with GrapheneOS be worthwhile for a major OEM?

This will be a regular phone that will be also sold with their stock OS as already said by the official channels many times. Just with some extra requirements like secure element etc.

VEECCdYKYi

I'm guessing Motorola. That would be great.
GrapheneOS weakest point is being soley reliant on one manufacturer.

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

VEECCdYKYi Also being stubborn and refusing to lower their standards thus excluding any other devices :( I'd be happy with a GrapheneOS Lite as well.

GrouchyGrape

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e sure, because GrapheneOS should be associated with an illusion of privacy and security... /s

If you want that illusion, there are plenty of other OS's/ROM's you can play with. The very reason I use GOS is because of their "stubbornness". Have you read through their requirements? There's no reason every manufacturer shouldn't meet them, but there's very little incentive for them to at the moment.

VEECCdYKYi

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e I don't agree but I do find it a bit weird that there hasn't been a project fork of GrapheneOS for more devices, lesser security standard but would benefit from an other of GrapheneOS improvements over stock.

Blastoidea

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e
That defeats the whole purpose.

A half-assed GOS is not anything I would even consider.

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

GrouchyGrape If you want that illusion, there are plenty of other OS's/ROM's you can play with.

I will when it's time to choose my next device. It will highly likely be a Pinephone unless the supposed GOS OEM partner offers a device with removable battery.

gta3

Its Nokia, they are trying to make a comeback

KCne

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e There still will be privacy while security against LE may not be relevant depending on use case.

Security enforces privacy. That’s why GrapheneOS is one of the most private OSs for consumers, it is secure enough to protect against many different types of vulnerabilities that protect against invasion of privacy.

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e Pinephone

https://xcancel.com/GrapheneOS/status/1985545689351536978#m

PinePhone has bottom of the barrel hardware with horrible security, performance and functionality. It's far from meeting our hardware security requirements grapheneos.org/faq#future-de…). The desktop software is also a huge regression for privacy and security (xcancel.com/GrapheneOS/status/1985…).

DeletedUser499

VEECCdYKYi hasn't been a project fork of GrapheneOS for more devices, lesser security standard but would benefit from an other of GrapheneOS

"Lesser security standard" means not secure.
Its either secure or not, do it properly or not at all...

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

DeletedUser499 Not all use cases require exceptional security.

VEECCdYKYi

DeletedUser499
If that's the case, nothing is secure. Everything is hackable. Would a Samsung device be less secure with a GrapheneOS fork installed. It would probably be same as stock OS. The security of stock OSes are obviously enough secure for people to use them.

NetRunner88

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

Should be

Look at all the personal informations leaks everywhere ..

dc32f0cfe84def651e0e

NetRunner88 There still will be privacy while security against LE may not be relevant depending on use case.

VEECCdYKYi

NetRunner88 the personal dataleaks are probably not because of Android based is, more servers. The problem as I see it is more that the databases store the data in the first place.

DeletedUser499

VEECCdYKYi If that's the case, nothing is secure. Everything is hackable.

Given time, your quote may be correct, however at present, there is one very obvious caveat to your quote, and its installed in my phone, thankfully.

NetRunner88

VEECCdYKYi
You missed the point.
Security should be at all levels.

« Previous Page Next Page »