RNDMNM Then, that's something that should've been posted here as it's more relevant to this pinned topic then the one you linked.
I would agree with you that it would be beneficial and relevant to this thread to have had that same communication here. However it is important to note that this very question is asked across multiple threads on this forum as well as other communication channels such as X, Mastodon, Telegram, Discord, etc. We can't expect the team to be able to track everything, everywhere, all the time. I have good faith in the team, moderators, and community to do their best, but there will be instances where they may "fall short" of your desired standards on communication.
RNDMNM I'm sure someone's going to say something negative to me
No negativity is appropriate here. Nothing wrong with having a differing viewpoint, perspective.
RNDMNM instead of there being the 160+ replies of speculation we have right now.
That "speculation" is not a fault of the GrapheneOS team, but of other sources.
RNDMNM I appreciate you linking the update from four days ago and hopefully you can appreciate what I'm trying to say.
Of course, I have no qualms with wanting more consistency across communication channels, that is desirable. However, I find it unnecessary to expect the team to keep stating over and over again that "No, Android QPR1 is not released yet".