- Edited
Testing Librewolf and Mullwad Browser on https://coveryourtracks.eff.org the mullvad browser does seems to have a less uniqe fingerprint. In my testing atleast.
Testing Librewolf and Mullwad Browser on https://coveryourtracks.eff.org the mullvad browser does seems to have a less uniqe fingerprint. In my testing atleast.
After testing both Librewolf and Mullva Browser in coveryourtracks.eff.org it appears that Mullvad Browser conveys 15.4 bits of identifying information as compared with Librewolf, which has 17.72 bits.
When comparing with amiunique.org, both browsers are showing up as being unique.
Does Chromium offer similar bowser anti-fingerprinting measures as Librewolf or Mullvad Browser? It seems as though there is greater confidence from an exploit mitigation standpoint, but what about fingerprint resist features?