zten m3ivu
I'm not the project member who provided that claim via the project account and I don't speak for others, this is not to say I disagree with it but will allow them to address those.
My position was based on their shoddy recommendations, from a company supposedly knowledgeable about what constitutes actual privacy and security they should know better and their prevalant obstinance to correcting their 'degoogle' options breaks my trust. As those who see degoogling as the maxim for their ideological bent, mine is a straight forward principled position.
As I've said elsewhere, the inter-financial/promotional capitalistic circle jerk by vendors promoting substandard privacy and security products in this space appalls me. It's the worst kind of human centipedal behaviour as they voluntarily swallow and regurgitate claims for each other to build SEO, mindshare etc
I can't keep ignoring this base approach, especially when if it comes down to me financially supporting a provider who claims principles who have gone to great lengths to build something with supposed technical merit but yet gives succour to companies and influencers who have none and whose own products don't stand up to even a basic cursory interrogation is depressing.
Whats worse is the way these businesses don't lift themselves up when found wanting but resort to campaigns of excuses, word salad and redefinitions at best and outright abuse, libel and defamation at worst.
So regardless I couldn't recommend funding and using a product that actively and knowingly misleads people.