CGG I guess there are a couple of things we have to take into account when we expect immediate action from any organization private or public: they won't cater for the 0.00001%. Period.
We are a privacy-concerned community, but far from being the mainstrream cases that will reach the top level of the roadmap. The same thing can be said avout GOS, for example!
I love GOS, but wouldn't expect that the team started developing features urgently to people missing vendor-specific behaviors of 1% of their user base, or expanding the roster of devices due to the costs of handling android hardware fragmentation.
I'm a true believer in collective action and public pressure, but a post in a somewhat obscure forum (for the Brazilian population) cannot be expected to achieve immediate results.
Take into account GOS runs exclusively on Pixel phones, and those are not sold in Brazil, so how can we expect that this becomes top-level prio because we told them so?
I believe keeping the debate running, exploring the technical alternatives, advocating beyond the forums and moving the needle on other data sovereign initiatives. However, those might yield faster results if such topics affect a larger share of the population, or cause more severe damage than a handful of users needing an extra phone.
I'm not saying this debate is useless, on the contrary! Let's keep it moving, but also be aware of what we can realistically expect out of it.