- Edited
Audacity0780 I have not been following closely, and am definitely not competent to review this code. But in terms of when something is ready to ship, more time passing doesn't make something more ready. If the code is done today (which it's not clear to me that it is), then the "Can it ship?" clock would start today, not back in July.
Meanwhile, the GrapheneOS developers may feel it's more important to work on things that a large fraction of users might benefit from (e.g., a privacy-respecting network-based location service) than on something that a smaller fraction of users would benefit from, even if that smaller user base would benefit substantially.
One thing that might help would be if the developer of the work-profile Play enhancement published work-in-progress system images that interested parties could install and test. Code structure and code quality are something that the GrapheneOS developers are very concerned about, but I suspect it would also be important for them to believe the code has been thoroughly tested. I am not an expert on this at all, but my sense is that there are at least a couple of different work-profile management apps, and also that companies force a variety of feature selections. So back-and-forth between the developer of this enhancement and users who are trying it might well be productive. By contrast, I am skeptical that the GrapheneOS developers will quickly find time to do thorough testing on their own.