lbschenkel Hi, I am back in DK, after a long (wedding week) abroad, where I did not have time to 'play around'with phones and such. I can read here, that unfortunately there has been a bad new 'rule' put in place by the masters of MitID. I did update to the latest stabel GOS and rebooted and all. Yet, I had my 'DK user´, the user that handles the DK apps, being random at granting internet access to the apps. Some had access, like my bank, but eBoks and Easypark did not. After some browsing around here and on my phone, i decided to reinstall GPS (google mirror)... and Voila.. both eBoks and Easypark have connection again. I am now in the process of waiting (1 hour) to copy my MitID to a second device, as that is now possible after 1 hour of waiting. So I will report back when I can do - or fail at installing MitID in that manor.

Unfortunately I get the same screen after copying from my other phone to the new GOS phone. Well, I have the code display and my old phone still, so no real loss.. Lets see if there is a new future for this app in 2025... or later.. New GOS users from Denmark, get a Code Display (for free) before deleting your old phone/Device with MitID on it.
Thank you lbschenkel, proxima and fido2 and all other in trying to get to the bottom of this issue... yes.. we have reached the bottom.... :(

fid02 Grooty I took the easy way out and wrote their support. I have made a translated summary here (their email reply contains a whole lot of Google marketing, that I have filtered out):

We use Google Play Integrity on Android and Apple Integrity Assertion on iOS, to ensure that users are not using "false apps" that masquerade as MitID, and that the app is downloaded from an official store. We provide them the code and limited backend access, in order for them to verify that the app binary is legitimate. This is not a kind of scam that is currently being employed, but we want to stay ahead of the threat.

I initially asked them why they went the Google Play Integrity way, and not things like hardware attestation, but I got most of the relevant information for this thread.

Does anyone know of a way, to achieve the same as what they set out to do, but via hardware attestation instead? It sounds like they are trying to solve the following:

  1. Verify the operating system
  2. Verify the app binary is legitimate
  3. Verify that the app is downloaded from Google Play Store, and not somewhere else

If so, I wouldn't mind forwarding them that information, and see if I can change their minds about the implementation.

    Apathy Does anyone know of a way, to achieve the same as what they set out to do, but via hardware attestation instead?

    https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

    Though it is not clear to me why they should require that the app is installed from exactly one app store. Isn't the EU compelling Apple to support multiple app stores?

      de0u I believe they're trying to avoid users having a version that's installed from other sources, as that's a dead giveaway for a fake app. I know that there's other legitimate app stores out there, so I'll try to convince them of a whitelist approach instead of only Google Play; whole thing is pretty ridiculous, since that field can easily be spoofed.

      • Edited

      Apathy Thanks. Based on the available evidence, I think this additional information pretty much confirms that they are using Google Play Integrity to check for a Google-certified OS.

      The best bet, the way I see it, would be to try to convince them to implement hardware attestation. I have a feeling that making them back down on Play Integrity OS-checks specifically is going to be really hard, considering their very clear public announcement that it is "protecting users". I imagine they would be worried about criticisms regarding backing down on that practice.

        fid02 That would be primarily a phrasing thing: Instead of saying "we're backing down from this", phrase it more like "We are taking this a step further, both in terms of security, but also in the name of privacy and to avoid lock-in with a single specific vendor."

          Apathy That's true. Good point.

          I have written them back now, with my arguments, reasoning, and suggested phrasing. Hopefully we'll hear some good news soon, though I sadly doubt it; it is a public entity after all.

            12 days later

            I ended up ordering a MitID kodeviser (hard token) Monday evening, it shipped Tuesday, arrived today, and it'll be working from tomorrow :)

            13 days later

            Apathy did you ever get a response back from them? I am have begun to carry my MitID code authenticator with, as I fear that the MitID app might just stop working for me.

            So a definitive answer, if you recieved, any at all, would be nice.

            a month later

            Does anyone know if theres been an update on this? I am interested in upgrading to a Pixel 9, but losing MitID authentication with my phone kinda sucks, so I might stay with my current phone until my previously activated MitID stops working. Alternatively, does anyone know if transferring Authenticators skips the Play Integrity check?

              CutStandard8309 i must refer to my workaround in this threat from february 21. Please go read that, this fix still works making GPS only needed for initial setup. I use MitID everyday on my pixel 5

                Duckduck That is not a viable solution anymore, as MitID has stated using Play Integrity during the activation process, so the presence of Play Services is no longer enough to activate MitID. Old installations of MitID work fine for the time, but activating a new authenticator is currently not possible.

                I have, like @Apathy contacted MitID and suggested that they either start using hardware attestation or allow advanced users to somehow opt out of the Play Integrity checks.

                5 days later

                There is a new version of MitID (3.4.2) with a few UI changes. I updated to it and it kept working without any (new) issues.

                  Grkrz

                  fingerprint is gone now

                  I don't get what you meant?

                    15 days later

                    I hope MitID fixes this soon.
                    I get the standard your phone is rooted/compromised/downloaded outside play store message. I’ve been trying for a few days to move MitID from my iPhone to my grapheneos phone using “copy from other MitID app” and no luck so far.
                    Using pixel 8 pro with the latest updates.

                    I guess getting an updated passport or a code from Borgerservice won’t help either.
                    This is very frustrating, sadly. (I’m angry at MitID not grapheneos)

                    lbschenkel before I was able to unlock with the finger print but the option is not available any more. Perhaps I need to set it up again.