MSAB claims that XRY Pro can infiltrate Pixel6 and Pixel7 through a RAM brute force attack (AFU access).
I understand that it is possible to penetrate through RAM exploits on Pixel6 and Pixel7 in an AFU state, as stated in other thread.
However, they claim that XRY Pro can do full file system extraction on Pixel with Graphene OS installed based on the consent base. I think this means that XRY Pro cannot break into a Pixel with a password-protected GrapheneOS installed.
Why do you think XRY Pro cannot break into a Pixel with GrapheneOS installed and password locked?
Reference:
https://www.msab.com/updates/now-out-xry-10-6-1-release-support-for-ios-17-beta-wider-device-range-and-multiple-app- enhancements/
https://www.msab.com/product/xry-extract/xry-pro/

As an aside, I would like to know if Cellebrite Premium can unlock the Pixel if GrapheneOS is installed. Please let me know if anyone knows.

    other8026 locked the discussion .

    TitanMPro locking this as a duplicate. But I think I should point out that they only claim they can do consent-based filesystem extractions, which means they're first given the PIN/password to unlock the phone.

    Please refer to the following discussions for more information:

    https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/8624-msab-xry-cracking-pixels/3

    https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/7703-protection-from-xry-pro/3