UuserA
- 11 days ago
- Joined 11 days ago
Some good conversations emerged here. The dummy profile functionality would obviously not provide any use, if the law enforcement has your attention. Once they have your device, youre pretty much compromised.
Its purpose is to not draw any attention while on a quick inspection without having to wipe the data.- Edited
GrouchyGrape This post mainly focuses on the feature, and that is an example of where this feature could be a benefit.
However for your question:
https://www.newsweek.com/french-scientist-banned-us-entry-messages-trump-2047549
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2025/03/22/how-a-french-researcher-being-refused-entry-to-the-us-turned-into-a-diplomatic-mess_6739415_4.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/21/world/europe/us-france-scientist-entry-trump.html
"U.S. authorities saw these messages as "hate and conspiracy messages," which prompted an FBI investigation that was later dropped. However, the researcher was sent back to France."
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/17/us/brown-university-doctor-deported-hnk/index.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/17/rasha-alawieh-deportation-026038The US is checking people's devices and denying entrance to for having content on their phone deemed critical of Trump, or for storing legal photos of Muslim leaders. This is a purely objective post. I am not here talking about whats right or wrong. However this is invading a person's privacy.
A feature that creates a secondary passcode (fingerprint, password, pattern...) to open a dummy profile in Android would be useful to protect against this.