de0u Because I've encountered the exact same issue as @Pardo, I'll provide what I can from my own experience, here.
For my case, the only difference is that I'm dealing with a Pixel 9a that I've just purchased.
At about 32% battery life, I actually hooked it up to charge, not realizing I had unplugged the USB wall adapter in favor of another appliance the night before. Naturally, the phone battery drained entirely (so, certainly drained to zero). When I saw this, I plugged the charger back into the wall, and later attempted to boot it up after it had reached 95%. This is when I encountered the boot looping issue, so here I am.
As of yet I've not attempted any sideloading with adb whatsoever (adb devices coming up with nothing connected...so, that's a separate issue for me to resolve before continued troubleshooting). But here are the final 9 lines of my own recovery logs. I hope it can be relevant to anyone who might be able to investigate further.
[0.291400] W:[libfstab] Warning: device does not exist : /dev/block/by-name/zoned_device
[41.431748] W:[libfstab] Warning: device does not exist : /dev/block/by-name/zoned_device
[41.431748] I:[libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c 10000 –debug-cache /dev/block/sda10
[41.437481] Cannot log to file /dev/fscklogs/log
[41.437542] ERROR: logwrapper: Cannot log to file /dev/fscklogs/log
[41.437543]
[41.523807] I:[libfs_mgr] __mount(source=/dev/block/platform/13200000.ufs/by-name/metadata,target=/metadata,type=f2fs)=0: Success
[101.159337] I:Clearing BCB
[101.159754] W:[libfstab] Warning: device does not exist : /dev/block/by-name/zoned_device
On a related note, however, when I encounter the same warning @Pardo encountered when reaching the Apply update from ADB submenu:
GrapheneOS Recovery
google/tegu/tegu
16/BP2A.250705.008/2025080400
user/release-keys
...
Overwrite in-progress update?
An update may already be in progress. If you proceed, the existing OS may not longer boot, and completing an update via ADB will be required.
Included the header, just in case any of that information is relevant. So at least certainly in my case, where I've not yet attempted an update via sideloading, this warning gives me the impression that an automatic update was perhaps incomplete?
Anyway, for anyone who can investigate the issue further, now you have two identical cases available for the process.