nandohyphen1 here is a list of Vanadium specific features: https://grapheneos.org/features#vanadium
Also, here are some posts I've linked from other discussions on this forum.
@matchboxbananasynergy One killer feature that puts Vanadium above Brave from a security perspective is the fact that JIT is disabled by default, and there's a per-site toggle for sites that absolutely require it. A lot of vulnerabilities hinge on JIT being enabled, so having it disabled is a huge boost to security. Apple's lockdown mode also disables JIT in Safari. It's a very important feature.
Source: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/2611-why-is-vanadium-better-than-a-hardened-version-of-brave/2
@final Numerous fingerprinting tests are not reliable as they rely on a pool of results of the userbase of the website, many of which use very different setups in comparison to the average person. Some browsers also do fingerprinting protections differently i.e. Brave randomizes data while Tor tries to keep it the same as possible.
Likewise, the only other browser the project recommends is Brave. It preserves mobile Chromium's security posture while adding additional state partitioning, anti-fingerprinting improvements and the most advanced content filtering engine. Vanadium has greater security enhancements like MTE support in production but needs to catch up in some areas. The new filtering for Vanadium is a part of the improvements.
Source: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/7141-chromite-vs-vanadium-for-the-average-person/31