Rizzler the right to own doors on your bathroom are also political, its just not an active political issue, because no one disagrees with it.
GOS is inherently political, many of their choices (not providing provider apps in base, preventing certain types of tracking, not providing LE backdoors) are all political choices. GOS makes a political choice every time a state actor asks them to open a backdoor, which they would deny. GOS makes a political statement when they disable google services from accessing and scanning user data.
Sure, harden malloc isn't political, but gutting google services for user privacy is. Not everything is political, but GOS has made political choices by existing the way it does, and I'm happy they did, because its a service people need in modern day.
You are actively expressing your opinion, not "facts", you are making an argument of what you believe. I am doing the same.
Attempting to pass off your opinion as a 'fact' is overcompensation. It makes me feel you would rather just make a statement as a 'gotcha' than as a response to my past statement that would be replied to with more critical engagement.
Anyways, "political" ≠ divisive, but also keep in mind many, many people disagree with GOS on a fundamental value level...so if we want to say that it does mean divisive, then GOS fits perfectly.