nologo Sounds like the verification didn't check out, or something went wrong in this process. Did you check with Tinder's support?
After verifying, I regained access to my account the next day with a message stating the verification was successful. I've indeed contacted tinder about this issue and was provided a checklist of basic troubleshooting steps, then later told my ticket will be closed without further response.
nologo Why would it? Did you even ask Tinder if you were banned?
Not sure, that's why I'm here asking. I'm new and don't have very advanced technical knowledge of Graphene. I've read that some banking apps in particular will refuse to work, with no viable solution. In this case, I believe some kind of restriction may have been placed onto my account itself, which now follows across devices. As I searched for explanations, I discovered an entire 75k~ subreddit primarily dedicated to users attempting to resolve unexplained bans/shadowbans from match group dating apps (r/SwipeHelper). It appears these apps are particularly gung ho about issuing bans, and without transparency. There's also post here on discuss of a user who has reported being banned on Hinge for reasons unclear - https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/15918-questions-before-jumping-into-grapheneos/18
@5rlyn Word of caution about dating apps:
I do all the things when it comes to data privacy: Graphene, VPN, Email alias, etc...and it appears Hinge doesn't like that. After two weeks of no matches whatsoever, I began the process of deleting my account, only to be presented with a screen saying my account had in fact been banned. Hinge refuses to clarify what caused any of its users to receive a ban, but I didn't interact with anyone on the app so it can't have been any sort of community standards violation or anything.
Tinder has almost no real users on it at this point, and I don't agree with some of the decisions Bumble makes as a company, so I can't really speak to those apps. But I'm just letting you know I think Hinge thought my privacy precautions were suspicious enough to justify a ban.