nandohyphen1
Duress Pin as currently implemented works effectively and does exactly what it says. It is also, as a practical matter, not just utterly worthless but an actively bad idea to ever use except in a miniscule handful of situations.
If you have a strong password/phrase then your GOS device is, as a practical matter, secure against access even at the top tier nation state level unless you provide the password.
Claiming that you've forgotten the password is generally going to get you in minimal legal trouble. "I changed it two days before you seized the device, and that was months ago. I think it was XYZ but I honestly don't remember."
On the other hand, providing/using a duress pin is spoliation of evidence and in the US, at least, that comes with a presumption that the evidence you destroyed was as bad for you as it could possibly be. Essentially, you will be found guilty of whatever you are accused of and the Judge is going to max out your sentence.
Being able to provide a password that, to all appearances, is the correct one but would wipe a particular profiles Private Space in a manner that it can't be forensically proven that Private Space ever existed in the first place would be huge.
You need to provide a password, you do, even forensic examination of the device can't prove that the information existed or was deleted.
Now will such a feature be implemented? I doubt it.