kookily50 I didn't want to install and Google or Meta apps onto my new phone once I added Graphene, so I've been accessing these services through Hermit. It can be a bit frustrating and limiting though. I'm wondering if it's really worth it.
Generally it is recommended to use GrapheneOS the same way you would use your previous smartphone. This helps alleviate self-imposed frustration that may come with changing too many habits at once. There were cases of people blaming this on the OS, which has nothing to do with such an issue.
kookily50 If I'm still going to be using Meta and Google services, am I really achieving anything by also avoiding the apps?
Sure, from a privacy standpoint, using web versions of untrusted apps is better. This is because good browsers (e.g. Vanadium, Brave) share much less data with websites than installed Android apps get access to.
kookily50 If I install the apps on a Graphene device, I assume the Graphene functions still give me a level of protection against being tracked and monitored?
GrapheneOS provides many improvements over AOSP and Stock Android. Scopes are especially great for invasive apps. However, it is not feasible for the OS to protect against app tracking user activity happening within app itself.
kookily50 Or is it much better to avoid the apps and use the web versions?
Overall, GrapheneOS provides freedom. It's up to each individual to decide what to do with it.
If you feel overwhelmed and decide not to use your current method, I would suggest putting invasive apps inside private space. This way they at least won't be able to see all of your installed apps and run after you close the space. Remember that private space doesn't inherit all settings from its parent profile. This is especially important for using a VPN.