Franckienogotobollywood I understand that the CSAM can pose some problems for privacy but there has been so much abuse on minors that I am rather for. Apple's solution was not bad and it was transparent.
It is a bit unclear to me what you tried to say. I also don't really feel like drifting in a political direction since that is forbidden on these forums, so I try to only answer objectively. Is Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) a privacy issue? Yeah definitely, to the depicted child it is a gross privacy issue. Is CSAM scanners a privacy issue? I would say it depends on how it is implemented. Should we try to stop the spread of CSAM? I believe it is a widely held opinion that we should, and why this is talked about at governmental level right now, with high approval rate. Should we try to do it with AI based and image hash based CSAM scanners? I don't necessarily think the idea in itself is bad, but it depends on how it is implemented.
To be clear, the issue with client side scanning was never that it tries to detect CSAM or even tries to block its sending or retrieval. At worst you might scream "censorship!" about that, but I don't think screaming that has much merit unless it is the child depicted in the image that is screaming that. Either way, mandatory blocking is not a privacy issue, and is not what caused people to revolt against Apple's proposal and now Chat Control. The issue has always been the automatic reporting, or the leaking of private photos to remote server unencrypted, at the whim of an unreliable AI tool which does not understand context. If all they did was mandatory blocking, there would only be privacy benefits with it, no privacy drawbacks.