spl4tt But a collab with GOS would make it so
I don't know but I doubt it.
Viewpoint0232 I'd rather have a GrapheneOS phone with imperfect hardware security rather than development stopping altogether.
There will be minimum requirements such as verified start-up and MTE, but I think there are many of us who would prefer this to start with than to stop the project, that's for sure.
dhhdjbd I really dont get how it is possible that there are soo many phone manufactures making android phones,
yet they are all incapable of making a device with comparable security to a pixel.
Because it's very difficult to do as well when Google has invested a lot of money and resources in Pixel security because they (were) the benchmark in Android development, and Google takes security seriously, they may do some data collection, which could pose some confidentiality issues, but they certainly don't want the data they process to fall into the hands of competitors.
dhhdjbd I feel like they are all not interested in this, because they can just claim it is 'secure' and most people wont / cant look into it, and believe it.
Many users still think of security in terms of Antivirus and don't know that there's security in hardware, so yes, that's basically what's going on.