Why not just stream a browser against Browser Fingerprinting?

Quotesquestioner

It seems to be hard to beat browser fingerprinting. Till now there is nothing that works against all techniques big tech is currently using.
Why not just have a browser or application then, which knows just one website/connects just to one service and on this webside/server you can choose one of some browsers and then use these browsers. A browser in a browser type. The websites and services/servers on the other side of the internet wouldn't see the data of the end user device. Instead theybwould see the data from the browser streaming provider.
Mabe it could be set up in a way that the browser provider would not have a chance to know the identity of the users. At this point i think it would be better as an application than a website that could be reached from amy other browser. I dont know you are the experts.
I saw this on a video from network chuck.
It's a pay to use option.
But why there is no.browser yet, where a funktionality like this is implemented in some form?
Or is it a good idea but almost nobody just did it yet?

I think it would be easy to make. In vanadium a few buttons and options to connect to a vanadium server and the server than interacts with the internet. The screen size could be some norm options so mabe it does not fit exactly in the end but again, you are the experts. Am i missing something or why is there only one option i can find which is the one from network chuck but as a paid option.
Last thing if you reach the service over tor and you stream the tornbrowser tor over tor would be possible for the extra paranoid tin foil people

GrapheneOS

Quotesquestioner You would be massively trusting the service with your data and you could be fingerprinted based on using a very niche service only used by a few people unless it was very widely used.

Streaming from virtual machine environments to client devices is a common approach and there are major downsides. There are attempts at providing forms of protected virtual machines with attestation to prove they're protected by the hardware and have encrypted memory but it's not a very strong approach to security and isn't really something you would want to rely on as opposed to a decent extra layer of security.

Quotesquestioner

GrapheneOS is there a use case scenario where you think it would be a great option or is it really not very useful because of the reasons you mentioned and maybe more reasons?

I didn't thought on using this for stuff with personal data involved and i think if many people use it then fingerprinting wouldn't be a thing and if it could be set up in a way where the service provider don't unique identifiers from the user it would be pretty safe, but yeah it's a non developer opinion with few knowledge.