Oh, and BTW...
Searching for the third term usually[1] brings up the guardian link as the main link - theguardian[.]com/technology/2014/jun/17/truecrypt-secret-message-nsa-spying - you really don't have to be a genius of logic to find flaws in their reasoning...
If you know what terms 'seo' and 'the guardian' are, you will easily understand what it is about.
Another piece of evidence pointing to the same thing is the extremely large number of reasonable users' comments, arguing that "move along... nothing happened here" occured. Utilitarian explanation on how to spot these comments: when you read these comments, you - a typical paranoid - get that kind of feeling when you starts thinking: well, it could have happened that way too... ;)
[1] It used to be 100% first hit in searcher, tested on various real user's devices, on various search engines. However, it could have happened that they saw how weak article's arguments were and stopped promoting this link with SEO.