Interesting. Does this mean put your main profile as 6PIN and secondary with sensitive diceware or the opposite?
Shouldn't the main user have the more difficult password?
JayJay
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "main profile" - the owner profile or your daily driver (which can also be a simple user profile).
But basically, the following applies to all profiles: Each profile has its own encryption keys with which its data is decrypted and no profile has access to another profile's data (in relation to user profiles - it's different using work profiles created with Apps like Shelter or Insular, for example).
Our recommend for most people tends to be a random 6 digit PIN for regular use and then put particularly sensitive things in a secondary user with a 7-8 random diceware word passphrase.
I would assume the essence of the tweet is that sensitive data is packed into a different profile (where its data ist at rest until it is explicitly needed and the corresponding profile is unlocked) more than if you use PIN or diceware password for one or the other.
The peculiarity and - if you like - slight disadvantage of the owner profile regarding storing sensitive data is that it has to be unlocked first (befor being able to access another profile) and it always runs in the background, even if you switch to another profile. Its data - unlike a user profile - also can't be put back at rest (BFU) via "end session" (which is very convenient).
A good overview of how disk encryption is implemented can be found here
https://grapheneos.org/faq#encryption
and additionally for BFU/AFU (not explicitly mentioned in the FAQ) here:
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/10108-pixel-afu-vs-bfu-security
A separate subject is the question of password strength. As already posted by others above, both
a) a 6 digit PIN
b) a passphrase consisting of 7 random diceware words
are considered quite secure against brute force attacks.
Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages:
a) is more convenient but is only as secure if the secure element throtteling (Weaver) works
b) is more inconvenient, but offers good protection against brute forcing even without Weaver
This applies to both owner and user profiles.